On Automating the Doctrine of Double Effect
نویسندگان
چکیده
The doctrine of double effect (DDE ) is a longstudied ethical principle that governs when actions that have both positive and negative effects are to be allowed. The goal in this paper is to automate DDE. We briefly present DDE , and use a firstorder modal logic, the deontic cognitive event calculus, as our framework to formalize the doctrine. We present formalizations of increasingly stronger versions of the principle, including what is known as the doctrine of triple effect. We then use our framework to simulate successfully scenarios that have been used to test for the presence of the principle in human subjects. Our framework can be used in two different modes: One can use it to build DDE -compliant autonomous systems from scratch, or one can use it to verify that a given AI system is DDE -compliant, by applying a DDE layer on an existing system or model. For the latter mode, the underlying AI system can be built using any architecture (planners, deep neural networks, bayesian networks, knowledge-representation systems, or a hybrid); as long as the system exposes a few parameters in its model, such verification is possible. The role of the DDE layer here is akin to a (dynamic or static) software verifier that examines existing software modules. Finally, we end by presenting initial work on how one can apply our DDE layer to the STRIPS-style planning model, and to a modified POMDP model.
منابع مشابه
Extending Formal Models of the Doctrine of Double Effect with Emotions
We have previously modeled the Doctrine of Double Effect (DDE) in a formal computational logic [1]. While DDE can account for a large range of human behavior in moral dilemmas (situations in which all available actions have positive and negative effects), the doctrines have to be further extended to account for how humans behave (and ought to behave). One such extension has produced a version o...
متن کاملبررسی آموزهی اثر دوگانه و نقش قصد در قضاوت اخلاقی
Ethical research and theories assign great importance to the role of intention in passing moral judgments about individuals’ actions. The doctrine of double effect is among ethical disciplines that differentiate between controversial medical situations such as end of life care or abortion, and intentional, premeditated damage, in that they consider the former impermissible and the latter permis...
متن کاملSingling out the double effect - sexual health advice and contraception are ethically distinct
This article is a response to an article previously published in LJPC, which employed the doctrine of double effect to explain the Gillick judgement and exculpate health care workers who provide contraceptives and sexual health advice to under-16s. In this analysis, the two acts: provision of contraceptives and provision of sexual health advice are examined separately against the four criteria ...
متن کاملThe principle of double effect and medical ethics.
In one of a series of articles on philosophical medical ethics, Gillon examines the Roman Catholic doctrine of double effect as it applies to discussions of the moral difference between acts and omissions in patient care. The doctrine holds that, in the context of actions that have both good and bad effects, an action that has a bad effect is morally permissible if (a) the action itself is goo...
متن کاملIs the Doctrine of Double Effect irrelevant in end-of-life decision making?
In this paper, we consider three arguments for the irrelevance of the doctrine of double effect in end-of-life decision making. The third argument is our own and, to that extent, we seek to defend it. The first argument is that end-of-life decisions do not in fact shorten lives and that, therefore, there is no need for the doctrine in justification of these decisions. We reject this argument; s...
متن کامل